Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
June 9, 2012

Facebook Now Has Its Own App Store

0 comments

Now Facebook applications can be found easily through a single source.

Friday yesterday, the social networking website just launched the App Center, an application that allows users to search for apps related to Facebook in all corners of the internet, including desktop applications, iOS, and Android.

App Center will be available on the pages of desktop and mobile sites Facebook and Facebook applications on iOS and Android mobile platform.

Facebook confirms that the App Center isn't to compete with Apple's App Center and Google Play despite having similar functions. This is because the App Center was connected to two stores belonging to the iOS platform application and Android.

The aim, among other things, that the third-party application developers gain a wider market in addition to the 900 million users of Facebook.

Last May the Facebook donate 83 million visits from its site to the shop Apple's App Store application. On Facebook alone, according to the statistics of the social networking website that, as much as 230 million users play games every month.

For now, the App has a new Center 600 applications, including popular titles such as Draw Something, Pinterets, Nike + GPS, and Ghost Recon Commander.

In addition to the mechanism of rating, the user will also get recommendations based on the application of the titles being played by Facebook friends of his.

Facebook App Center can expect increased popularity of applications associated with social networking sites, which in the end will help raise the popularity of Facebook.


Arif s.Driessen is the Editorial, Lifestyle, for Digital Works @ The Driessen Post.
Continue reading →
May 28, 2012

It’ll Be A Miracle If The Facebook Phone Doesn’t Suck

0 comments
Screen Shot 2012-05-27 at 10.30.22 PM

Here we go again: Facebook is apparently trying for the third time to get its phone project off the ground — snatching up iOS design and engineering talent left and right Nick Bilton is hearing.


We’re hearing (and seeing) similar regarding iOS talent, but with one caveat: Word on the street is that few mobile design wizzes actually want to work at Facebook, but everyone has their price, and post-IPO Mark Zuckerberg is willing to pay that price, whatever it is.


Does Facebook need a phone? Whatever the answer to that question is, the more important item is that it THINKS it needs a phone, most likely because it’s still lacking a clear mobile strategy with regards to revenue.


The platform wars have created the following paradox; in order to compete with Facebook, Google attempts to build a social network, In order to compete with Google, Facebook attempts to build a phone — both diverging away from their core competency in their efforts. I’ve never tried to build a phone, so I’m not going to begrudge anyone their ambitions, but a majority of industry insiders I’ve spoken to today have been super skeptical about the viability of a Facebook phone, some even coming right out and saying, “It’ll be a miracle if this doesn’t suck.”
Making phone hardware is hard work, much harder than anything Facebook has ever attempted in the past. The company as we have seen thrives on an iterative culture of hackathons where projects are completed over night. A low margin/high volume business like phone hardware, as Bret Taylor’s mobile and platform team seems to be painfully and publicly learning, takes years to do correctly.
And there is a huge risk that they will fail again.
This kind of project, as others have speculated, requires the kind of execution Facebook isn’t known for, and the company will most likely have to work with a third-party in order to actually ship. Some have suggested that it buy a beleaguered hardware startup like RIM or a stalwart like HTC because the kind of long-term focus required here is just not endemic to Facebook company culture.
Basically, there are a million ways this project will fail, and just one way it will work: Facebook ostensibly could succeed by tapping into the opening in the mobile market where people want an alternative to poorly designed Android phones — targeting people who would buy something other than an iPhone if the price point was $150 less and the design were at least a little bit more ambitious than what is currently available on Android. Picture a Lumia that’s one big Facebook app if you need a visual.
It’ll be a miracle if Facebook manages to come up with a finished product that’s designed and priced for everyone, captures at least 15% of the smart phone market, and becomes a direct competitor to Google. But stranger things have happened.
A Facebook phone seems inevitable. Mobile advancements like Apple’s iMessage, iOS Twitter integration and whatever Google is doing with Google+ mean that its status as the predominant interpersonal communications platform is being threatened. But it won’t introduce a phone until it absolutely thinks it has to, so the question becomes “How soon until it (thinks it) has to?” And “Will it be ready?”
Wherever the Facebook Mobile team is tonight, they should take the Microsoft Kin’s failure as a cautionary tale: Stay away from poor device design and arcane social plugins and focus on your strengths, bringing mainstay apps like Instagram, Messenger, Camera, Events and Facebook Games front and center. And be a great phone first and foremost; the Facebook part should come second.

Continue reading →
May 26, 2012

Facebook Browser Is Imminent [RUMOR]

0 comments

By: The Driessen Post, in Social Media News
Published: 05/26/2012



Are you ready for a browser that integrates social networking giant Facebook for your online life more than before? That could soon be on the road, according to reports.
A Friday Pocket-lint report cites a “trusted source” that Facebook wants to buy Opera Software — manufacturers of the Opera web browser, which claims more than 200 million users worldwide. The Facebook browser would include default menu bar plugins, further permeating Facebook into users’ general web experience, according to the report.
A Facebook spokesperson declined Mashable‘s request for comment.
A custom browser would be a significant step toward Facebook becoming your web, as opposed to just an Internet site you visit and service you use. Opera’s mobile browser has received strong reviews online, meaning a functional Facebook browser using it could be even more powerful. Facebook has struggled to penetrate mobile use as deeply as many think it should be able to — and will need to in order to sustain long-term growth.
A Facebook browser would also bolster the newly public company’s competition with Google. Google Chromerecently became the web’s most-used browser, but Facebook’s gigantic user base of more than 900 million people would present a potential serious threat down the line. It would be interesting to see Facebook try to battle Google for browser dominance as Google+ struggles to play catchup in social networking.
We’ll see if the Opera rumors are true, but if Pocket-lint‘s “man in the know” is even remotely hooked in, it’s not hard to imagine the arrival of a Facebook browser being only a matter of time.
How could a Facebook browser help the company take over the web — or can it? Share your perspective in the comments.


Source

Continue reading →
May 23, 2012

Facebook Settling ‘Sponsored Stories’ Privacy Lawsuit

0 comments
Photo: Marco Fieber/Flickr
By: The Driessen Post, SocialMedia - Junior Writer
Published: 05/23/2012 on SocialMedia
Facebook is agreeing in “principle” to settle allegations that its “Sponsored Stories” advertising platform breached its users’ privacy.
Terms of the deal (.pdf) were not immediately disclosed. The suit, (.pdf) filed in April 2011, claimed that the social-networking site did not adequately provide a way to opt out of the advertising program that began in January 2011.
Sponsored stories work like this: If a Facebook user “likes” an advertiser, that user’s profile and picture may appear on some of their friends’ Facebook pages — in ads — stating that the person, indeed, “likes” that advertiser. Facebook also reserves the right to do this on ads that appear on sites other than Facebook, though it has not done that.
Facebook and class-action attorneys were set to hold oral arguments Thursday in a San Jose, California, federal courtroom on whether the case could proceed as a class action representing perhaps millions of Facebook users. The lawyers wrote U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh on Tuesday that they have executed “a term sheet memorializing their settlement in principle.”
The development comes on the third trading day following Facebook’s IPO. It closed at $31, down from the original $38 asking price on Friday. The settlement agreement will eventually become public and requires Koh’s signature.
In November, the Federal Trade Commission slapped Facebook’s hand and settled government charges it “deceived” users that their information would be kept private, although it was “repeatedly” shared with the public.
The FTC deal, among other things, required Facebook to submit to a privacy audit every two years for the next two decades. The accord, which carried no financial penalties, demands that the social-networking site obtain “express consent” of its 850 million users before their information “is shared beyond the privacy settings they have established.”
Regarding Tuesday’s settlement, the ad settings at issue are not contained in Facebook’s privacy settings, and instead are in a section called Facebook Ads under the main profile settings.
While terms of Tuesday’s settlement were not lodged with Judge Koh, we suspect they will be similar to a 2010 settlement in a different Facebook privacy flap.
In that case, a  federal judge approved a $9.5 million settlement to a class-action lawsuit challenging Facebook’s so-called “Beacon” program that monitored and published what users of the site were buying or renting from Blockbuster, Overstock and other locations without users’ permission.
The lawyers in that case were awarded about $3 million of the pot, and the remainder was earmarked for grants to study online privacy.
Facebook, without admitting wrongdoing, terminated the Beacon program, though much of it has resurfaced under the guise of Facebook’s so-called “frictionless sharing.”
Under the latest deal, Facebook users likely would have to opt in to participate in the “Sponsored Stories” program or be provided a clear mechanism to opt out. It was not immediately known whether Facebook would kill the “Sponsored Stories” program.
The five named plaintiffs in the case will likely receive several thousand dollars each, while Facebook likely will admit no wrongdoing.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, who likely will reap millions in the latest case, did not immediately respond for comment. Facebook declined comment.




Continue reading →
May 21, 2012

Silicon Valley Can Do Better Than Facebook

0 comments
704px-1601californiaavelobby

Congratulations to Facebook for traveling public. Congratulations to the advisers that are now millionaires. Congratulations to the founders who are now billionaires. Congratulations to the bankers, attorneys and investors who accept added to their already ample wealth. You’ve grasped the assumption ring we’re all extensive for.

Yet the aggregation that’s been created isn’t what I wish from Silicon Valley.

Let’s lay abreast for a minute the foibles of the founders: Mark Zuckerberg’s hacking Harvard’s servers and the email accounts of journalists, his accommodation to “fuck” the Winklevii “in the ear” and Eduardo Saverin’s antic tax dodge. Let’s overlook about the Facebook Beacon “mistake” or the animadversion censorship thing. Let’s overlook about the aloofness implications. Just yield annihilation that makes you anxious about the aggregation and put it in a box for one minute to accede Facebook objectively.

Facebook sells advertising—it may be the a lot of able commercial belvedere back Google, or not—but that’s not the best use of the brightest minds of our generation. Commercial doesn’t beforehand our antithesis of trade. It doesn’t lift humans out of poverty. It doesn’t apply the abundantly skilled. It doesn’t extend activity expectancies or yield abroad pain. It doesn’t beforehand our accepted of living.

Silicon Valley is at its best if it uses its different aggregate of aptitude and basic to beforehand society, to actualize even bigger accoutrement for creation, to alleviate the abeyant of humans not just here, but beyond the globe.

Where Facebook Falls Short


There’s an old bank adage that if you don’t apperceive who is the accoutrement at the table, it’s you. The aforementioned ability be said of online businesses these days: if you don’t apperceive what’s been sold, it’s you. Facebook sells your content, your connections, your time, your attention, your claimed advice to advertisers. The aggregation is alone a aqueduct for what you do. Its value, set by the bazaar on Thursday, is a absorption of the account of what you’ve contributed and created.
Yes, anniversary time you assurance in to Facebook, you’re traveling to plan for Mark Zuckerberg. Anniversary time you amend your status, column a video, analysis in or just sit and watch everybody away do it, you band his pockets.
And I wouldn’t apperception that a bit. In fact, I would acclaim it, were the artefact of these hours added profitable.
The actuality is that abundant of the time spent on Facebook is wasted. The aggregation says in its S-1 that users spent an boilerplate of 175 actor hours per day on Facebook in February 2012. That’s a lot. Compare that to say, the 100 actor hours Clay Shirky and a researcher at IBM account it took to actualize all of Wikipedia.
What’s Wikipedia worth? I anticipate it’s priceless, but aback in 2008, Business Insider estimated that if it were to become a bartering enterprise, Wikipedia would be account $7 billion. Say it’s just bisected that—adjust for the Henry Blodget factor—and you’d see that the amount of contributions to Facebook, were they as admired as the time spent accidental to Wikipedia, care to be account $6.125 billion per day.
But it’s not. Accidental to Wikipedia increases the availability of the world’s knowledge. “Liking” Starbucks contributes alone to the ability advertisers can use to bigger ambition you.
It’s abundant bigger to watch television. Television, like Facebook, gets paid by advertisers for your time.When advertisers pay TV channels, the money flows to abounding altered pockets. There’s the TV stars, of course, but there’s aswell the crew: the craft-services, the set designers, the costumers, the band producers, the complete engineers, electricians, gaffers, writers and key grips. All the humans who accomplish the TV appearance get a allotment of that commercial dollar and these are acceptable jobs, abounding unionized, that don’t crave a adorned Stanford computer science degree. And anniversary getting active authoritative TV shows pays taxes and pumps their salaries aback into the economy.
And the artefact of their plan can be exported. When the U.S. sells movies and TV shows away it improves our antithesis of barter and helps accomplish the articles we import, such as iPads and oil, beneath expensive.
When advertisers pay Facebook, the money goes into the pockets of Facebook shareholders, advisers and computer makers. Most of Facebook’s banal is captivated by a individual getting and alone a small, baddest accumulation of awful accomplished programmers can defended a atom on the payroll. The abundance created by Facebook gets concentrated into the easily of a few—some of whom accept banned to pay taxes on their gains—instead of getting recycled into the greater economy. And the computer makers that accumulation Facebook await on apparatus alien from added countries, sending basic away and abrasion our antithesis of trade.
Facebook’s acceleration is abundant for Zuck, but unless you’re a part of a advantaged few, it isn’t acceptable for you.
There’s one added important aberration amid television and Facebook. Abundant television approaches art. I’ll bethink the ball of The Sopranos and the action from 30 Rock continued afterwards I’m done searching at those pictures of your niece’s baby.

We Can Do Better

The Facebook admirers are quick to avert the company’s value. It empowers connection! It brings humans afterpiece to anniversary other! You can’t put a amount on that! It helped adapt the Arab Spring, for advantage sake.
Facebook enhances apart access and keeps you in acquaintance with the humans you wouldn’t beforehand the time to alarm or address an email to. Seeing pictures of a friend’s ultrasound may be priceless, but the amount comes from you, your affiliation to the acquaintance and the phenomenon of life, not the account that delivers the image. Facebook did advice humans adapt in beforehand of the Arab Spring, but so did Twitter, email, SMS and abounding added vectors. And there absolutely were revolutions afore Facebook and will acceptable be revolutions continued afterwards Facebook admiral down its endure server.
Facebook isn’t bad. It is just a low-value use of time that doesn’t accord abundant to the abridgement above adorning the rich. What added admired things could be done with the time, energy, effort, adroitness and basic invested in its authoritative and circadian usage?
There are startups accomplishing amazing things actuality in Silicon Valley still. Sure there are the electric cars, apprentice butlers, amplitude rockets and a agglomeration of hyper-ambitious projects. But you can accept a absolute addition to the abridgement and the apple after abating blight or agronomics craving humans in Africa (there is a adventure close in San Francisco alive on acceptable agronomics if you do wish to accomplish a aberration in the subcontinent). I’m generally afflicted by humans alive to anticipate outbreaks of awful bacilli with accelerated anesthetic development or others creating systems to radically advance the activity ability of ample buildings. These companies’ goals are obtainable, their accomplishment would be benign and the articles would be the world’s envy.
With Facebook public, conceivably the accomplished half-decade of amusing networking, accidental games, basic worlds, MMORPGs, app stores, avatars and “pokes” will accord way to a renaissance of startup companies that accomplish absolute articles of actual amount that apply approved people. Such a acknowledgment to Silicon Valley’s roots could brace the American abridgement and already afresh put this different abode at the affection of animal progress.




Continue reading →
May 14, 2012

Facebook Testing Pay-Based Status Update Promotion Tool

0 comments
Facebook Testing Pay-Based Status Update Promotion Tool
Members of one of the Internet’s most popular social media websites may soon be able to pay in order to have their status updates more visible to their fellow users, Stuff’s Tom Pullar-Strecker wrote on Friday.
According to Pullar-Strecker, Facebook is currently test-marketing a feature that would allow subscribers to spend $2 in order to “Highlight” important posts that will make the content featured more prominently across the social network. He said that the program was accidentally discovered by a Facebook user who initially believed that it might be a scam, but a Facebook executive confirmed its validity to Stuff.

“We’re constantly testing new features across the site. This particular test is simply to gauge people’s interest in this method of sharing with their friends,” spokeswoman Mia Garlick told Pullar-Strecker. She added that they were also experimenting with various prices for the service, meaning that during the trial, users could be asked to pay any amount of money in order to take advantage of the promotion.

Josh Constine of TechCrunch said that the move demonstrates Facebook’s willingness to be more proactive in terms of brining in additional income, which should certainly attract the attention of potential investors. However, he added that the company “is playing with fire here,” potentially rubbing subscribers the wrong way by making some features of the website pay-to-use for the first time, especially to “younger and less financially equipped users who couldn’t afford such narcissism.”

In an update to his original report, the TechCrunch writer elaborated on his position.
“I understand what Facebook was going for with this. Sometimes you have a post you really need people to see, like ‘I need a kidney donor’, ‘I’m renting out my apartment’, or ‘I’m moving to New York, come say goodbye tonight.’” Constine said. “If Facebook wants to give people the option to boost the visibility of the occasional post, it should let people Highlight one post a month, or apply some other frequency cap. But if people can pay to Highlight posts as often as they want, it could do more harm than good.”

“The problem is the potential for Highlighted updates to reduce the general relevance of the news feed,” he added. “Facebook’s news feed sorting algorithm is designed to show you posts by your closest friends or that have received a lot of Likes and comments. Highlight distorts this, and will encourage news feed spamming club promoters, musicians, small businesses, or anyone else with something to gain from more clicks.”
Likewise, Gizmodo reporter Jamie Condliffe wrote, “Whether Highlight will ever turn into a fully-blown feature is difficult to tell. Given how much people enjoy talking about themselves, it’s certainly not impossible to imagine that the feature could generate a steady trickle of cash for the Big Blue. It’s even easier, however, to imagine how irritating it could become.”

Source: RedOrbit Staff & Wire Reports
Source: redOrbit
Continue reading →